Enter your phone number below (including country code) and hit 'Enter'

Latest tweets

facebook

WoW: Ibn al-Jawzee: Many of the Salaf weren't satisfied with only giving the poo...

PONDER THIS: In this particular moment in time - o reader - Allaah has blessed y...

QOTD: In the Qur'aan, Allaah informs us about the Prophet being sent as a Mercy...

Archive for September 2011

Mushrikeen and their Shirk

Ibn al-Qayyim:

Allaah the Most High cut of all means for the Mushrikeen to attach themselves to their false deities, in such an incredible way, only people with understanding will realize how amazing it is.

Because the sole reason why a Mushrik takes a false god besides Allaah and makes it their object of worship is due to their presumption that this being (idol, dead person, trees etc) can bring  them some sort of benefit.

And benefit is only gain through four types of means, these being;

FIRST: The object of worship is an Owner, and by worshipping the object it will grant you what you desire.

SECOND: The object of worship is not an Owner but rather is a partner and can still fulfill your wishes.

THIRD: The object of worship is neither an Owner nor a partner but is a helper to the Owner and can still answer your supplications.

FOURTH: The object of worship is neither an Owner nor a partner, not even a helper but only an intercessor and can thus bring you benefit in such a way.

And Allaah the Most High, refuted each of these four claims throughout the Qur’aan, one after the other, He is the only true Owner (al-Maalik) and has no partners whatsoever, nor does He have any helpers and no one can intercede on anyone’s behalf accept by His permission.

[Taken from Madaarij as-Saalikeen 1/343]

Changing places?

Do you ever think about what you do when you pray sunnah prayers? I mean after you just prayed maghrib for an example, what is it you do? Or specifically, why is it that everyone in the masjid always take a few steps to the side and prayer their sunnah prayers (some might even switch places with others)?

“It is so that you make more sujud on different places on the earth” some of you might reply, yes that’s all fine and good but do you not have some clear evidence to justify why you insist on changing the place of prayer? If a person asked you what evidence do you have to support your action? What do you respond?

Well the answer is quite simple (and yes it is actually from the Sunnah!) lets read Saheeh Muslim and check shall we?

Mu’aawiyyah bin Abee Sufyaan said:

The Messenger of Allaah commanded us not to pray a Salah straight after another Salah unless we would [separate it with] talk or leave [our place].

And Imaam an-Nawawee explains this saying:

In this hadeeth there is evidence for what the scholars say that it is preferred to pray the optional prayers in another place than where one prayed their obligatory prayer. And the best place for that is the house, but any other place inside the masjid will be valid.

[Taken from Saheeh Muslim The book of Jumu'ah p. 409-410]

Respecting people of innovation

Sometimes you might wonder why certain people are so harsh towards innovators. Yes, of course innovation is a bad thing in Islaam, but isn’t it just a mistake like any other mistake? Why be so stern towards them?

The great scholar Imaam ash-Shaatibee explains this beautifully in his book al-’Itisaam:

And if a person gives respect to an innovator then this creates two major problems that will in reality aid in the destruction of Islaam.

FIRST: If you respect people of innovation then the general masses will be deceived by this and will presume (due to the importance you are giving this innovator) that he is the best of all mankind, and that which he is upon (i.e. his innovation) is good and thus people will follow his innovation and leave off the Sunnah.

SECOND: If you respect the people of innovation then this will serve as a motivation for them and encouragement and this in turn will cause them to increase in more innovations and thus innovations will come to life and the Sunnah will die, since these two things cannot coexist.

 

[Taken from al-'Itisaam by Imaam ash-Shaatibee p.32-33]

Random Article

Speaking without knowledge

`Ata’ ibn As-Sa’ib said:

 “I knew knowledgeable persons who would experience extreme fear on answering a question posed to them lest it would be wrong.”

`Umar ibn Al-Khattab would also say to his Companions:

 “The readier one of you is to answer any question posed to him, the readier he is to enter the Hellfire.’’

Ibn Mas`ud also said:

“I strongly believe that he who gives his opinion on every matter people ask him about is really unwise.”

Whenever the most knowledgeable person among the righteous Successors Sa`id ibn Al-Musayyab came to giving a legal opinion on a certain matter, he would say: “O Allah save me from giving a wrong opinion and spare others the wrongness of my opinion.” Many times Abu Hanifah was reported to have said ‘‘I do not know the answer” although he was brilliant in answering (difficult) juristic questions and showed great ability in deducing and generating juristic rulings. Al-Khatib Al-Baghdadi quoted Abu Yusuf as saying, “I heard Abu Hanifah saying, ‘But for fear of Almighty Allah’s wrath that I had not made use of my knowledge, I would not have given fatwas at all to whoever asks me. The person who asks me gets the benefit of knowing the answer anyway, while I bear the responsibility (before Almighty Allah) if it has been wrong!’” Abu Hanifah also said:

 “One who gives fatwas and imparts religious knowledge freely without thinking that Allah would bring him to account by asking him, How come you give fatwas without possessing the required knowledge to give them? Such a person is putting himself and his religious commitment at stake. Imam Malik showed far greater cautiousness in this regard. For example, he said, “When a scholar is asked a question, he should first consider to where he will be admitted in the Hereafter, the Paradise or the Hellfire, and reflect upon how he will save himself from punishment on that Day, and then he can answer the question.”

Ibn Al-Qasim reported, “I heard Malik saying ‘I am reflecting on a juristic question for more than ten years now and I have not reached an answer yet.’”  Ibn Mahdi also quoted Malik as saying “I may spend a whole night meditating upon one juristic question.” Mus`ab as well reported, ‘‘My father asked me to take a person who has a problem to Malik to ask him about a solution to it. When I did, Malik said ‘I do not have a solution to it. Ask the knowledgeable people about it.’” Ibn Abu Hassan said about Malik, “Once, Malik was asked twenty-two juristic questions, yet he did not answer more than two questions of them, saying every now and then ‘There is neither might nor power except with Allah.’” Sometimes Malik would say on being asked a juristic question, “(Religious) knowledge is far wider than this.” Once upon his saying statements of this kind, some people said to him, “If you [with all that knowledge] say you do not know, who else would?” He replied, “What are you saying? You do not know me well! I am nobody! What is it that distinguishes me from you so that I know what you do not know?” He then quoted Ibn `Umar as saying “I am not as knowledgeable as you think me to be; I am nobody! It is self-conceitedness and seeking prominence in society that bring about ruin to people, and thus few are the people who have true knowledge.” Mus`ab also related, “Once, Malik was asked about something and he said, ‘I do not know the answer.’ The questioner, who was an influential person, said, ‘It is an easy question and I just want to inform the prince about an answer to it.’ Malik replied, ‘An easy question! There is nothing easy in (religious) knowledge. Have you not heard Almighty Allah’s words (Soon shall We send down to thee a weighty Message) (Al-Muzammil 73:5)? Knowledge of this message is thus not as easy as you say, especially when it comes to asking about fatwas derived from it!’” Malik was also reported to have said every now and then on giving fatwas, ‘‘There is neither might nor power except with Allah’’ and(We deem it naught but a conjecture, and we are by no means convinced) (Al-Jathiya 45:32). Abu Dawud reported that once Imam Ahmad was asked to give his personal juristic opinion on a question, but he said, “Let us not tackle such innovated matters.” Abu Dawud also said:

“Many times I heard Imam Ahmad saying (when asked to give his opinion) on controversial scholarly issues ‘I do not know.”

Once, a man came to Imam Ahmad and asked him to give his personal opinion on a certain matter, but he said, “I have no answer to it.” Then he cited the statement of `Abdullah ibn Mas`ud referred to above.

[...] read more

Random Fatwa

Passing away in Ramadhaan

Question: The Prophet said;
When Ramadhaan arrives the doors of Paradise are flung open and the doors of Hellfire are slammed shut.
Does this mean that one who dies in Ramadhaan enters Paradise without questioning? Answer: The situation is not as such. Rather, what this means is the doors of Paradise are flung open as an inspiration to the Muslims to make easy their entry (to Paradise). And the doors of Hellfire are shut to prevent the Believers from sins such that they do not enter (through) these doors. And this does not mean that one who dies in Ramadhaan enters Paradise without questioning, rather those who shall enter Paradise without questioning are those whom the Messenger has described in his statement;
They are the ones who do not steal and do not cauterise and are not pessimistic and in their Lord they put their trust.
[Fataawa Shaykh Muhammad as-Saalih al-Uthaymeen Volume 1, Page 561]

[...] read more

Random Audios

  • al-Arba’een an-Nawawiyyah – part twelve Shaykh Ibraheem ar-Ruhaylee
  • al-Arba’een an-Nawawiyyah – part four Shaykh Ibraheem ar-Ruhaylee
  • al-Aajroomiyyah – part 1 'Abdul Kareem al-Khudayr