Enter your phone number below (including country code) and hit 'Enter'

Latest tweets

facebook

JOKE: I am having a difficult time deciding on which quote is the funniest. Perh...

WoW: Imaam Maalik: "Whomever curses the Companions has surely disbelieved!" [al-...

PONDER THIS: If you meet someone who talks bad about the Sahabah or mistrusts th...

Wiping the socks in Wudhu

As with regards to the wiping then all the scholars of Fiqh are in agreement that it is allowed for a person to wipe the leather socks, but they differed about the wiping of any other type of sock.

Some scholars allowed it where as others did not, and from the latter group i.e those who did not allow it were Imaam Maalik Imaam Shaafi’ee and Imaam Aboo Haneefah. As for those who allowed it they were Aboo Yusuf and Muhammad [students of Imaam Aboo Haneefah] including Sufyaan ath-Thawri and Imaam Ahmad bin Hanbal.

And the reason for the difference of opinion was that they differed about the narrations mentioning wiping of the socks, are they authentic or not? As well as wether you are allowed to wipe the socks simply because you are allowed to wipe the leather socks and the fact that the two resemble eachother.

So as for the scholars who considered the hadith not authentic or the hadith might not have reached them and they did not allow wiping the socks based on the wiping of leather socks then they gave the ruling that it was not allowed.

As for the others who considered the hadith authentic and allowed the wiping of the socks based upon the wiping of the leather socks then they allowed it.

The narration is not mentioned by Bukhaari nor Muslim but it is declared authentic by at-Tirmidhi

And it has been reported that Imaam Maalik allowed the wiping of the sock as long as the bottom was made out of leather.

 [Bidaayatul Mujtahid wa Nihaayatul Muqtasid, by Ibn Rushd page. 46]

7 Comments

  1. Hassaan says:

    jerzakallah kheir. Thanks for that, it definitely helped.
    keep up with the posts inshallah.

  2. Umm Juwayriyah says:

    JazakhaAllaahu khayran….very confusing topic for me still.

  3. Umm Tasneem says:

    So basically ders different of opinions. Jazakallah khair, ive been meaning to do research on this for a while now. Barakallahu feek akhi!

Leave a Reply

Random Article

The fake Scholar/Student of knowledge

And from his character in seeking knowledge is that he seeks it whilst being in the state of neglect and forgetfulness. He only seeks the knowledge which his desire calls him towards.

And if it's said, 'How is that possible?'

The reply is, his aim in seeking knowledge is not due to him thinking it is fardh upon him or in order for him to worship Allaah by fulfilling His obligations and staying away from the things He has declared unlawful, No! Rather his aim is to become known to the people as a taalib-ul-'ilm (student of knowledge) and so that the students flock around him.

He studies only for Riyaa (showing off) and debates with others in order to be known for his knowledge and eloquence in discussion. If the person he is debating with has the truth with him, it causes him grief. Even if he knows he is wrong he carries on debatting and never declares he is mistaken due to fear of people criticising his mistakes.

He is lenient with giving fatwaa to those he loves and is severe and stern against those who can not benefit him at all. Whoever he teaches knowledge to he expects benefits back from. And if his students can not benefit him in this world but only benefit him in the aakhirah, teaching them becomes a burden upon him (and he sees it as a waste of time).

He anticipates the reward for knowledge he never practised, and is not afraid of the consequences for knowledge he never acted upon. He speaks words of wisdom so it might seem he is from its people, whilst not fearing the evidence being established against him, because he doesn't practise what he preaches. The more he learns and seeks knowledge the more he shows off and boasts.

If the scholars of his time are many in number and they are mentioned as people of knowledge he wishes to be mentioned with them. If they, the scholars, are asked about a question and he is not asked he wishes he be asked as well, when it was upon him to praise Allaah who just saved him from being asked when others had fulfilled the need.

If it reaches him that any of the scholars made a mistake whilst he got the right verdict, he becomes happy for the mistakes of others, when in reality he should be sad for the mistakes of his brothers. If any of the scholars pass away it makes him happy since now people will be in need of him and his knowledge more.

And if he is asked about a matter that he has no knowledge of, it becomes difficult for him to say 'I do not know'. If he hears about someone else that is benefiting the people more than he is, he hates him and does not tell the people about him. His pride stops him from admitting his own mistakes, even when corrected by others he will keep on defending his mistake, despite knowing it is a blatant mistake, just so that he might not be looked down upon by the people.

His fitnah (trial) is love for this dunya and being praised by mankind along with status and nobility. He beautifies himself with knowledge as people in this dunya beautify themselves with jewlerry but he forgets to beautify his knowledge with actions.

[Taken from 'Akhlaaq al-'Ulamaa by al-Aajoriyy]

[...] read more

Random Fatwa

The Ruling on saying Jumu’ah Mubaarak(ah)

[...] read more

Random Audios

  • al-Arba’een an-Nawawiyyah – part four Shaykh Ibraheem ar-Ruhaylee
  • al-Arba’een an-Nawawiyyah – part nineteen Shaykh Ibraheem ar-Ruhaylee
  • al-Arba’een an-Nawawiyyah – part three Shaykh Ibraheem ar-Ruhaylee